![]() ![]() The defendant did not immediately comply and briefly moved out of the officer’s sight. One of the officers requested that she come back closer towards the rear of the vehicle. While one officer was on the passenger side of the car and another officer was at the rear driver side, the defendant walked towards to front of the driver side. An officer asked her to move back from car as officers searched, but she refused. She ultimately consented to a search and closely watched the officers during their search. She was “belligerent, cursing, and very loud” from the time she arrived. The defendant was notified and quickly arrived on scene. During a random canine walkthrough of the school’s parking lot, the dog alerted on the car. 31, 2020), the defendant’s daughter drove the defendant’s car to high school. Today’s post examines the decision and some of its implications.įacts. 31, 2020), struck down a conviction for RPO, and highlights some interesting limitations on the offense. ![]() In 2019, the offense of resist, obstruct, or delay of a public officer (hereafter “RDO”) was one of the most common misdemeanor convictions in the state, a pattern consistent with previous years (see here and here for 20 data). For those that prefer their criminal law updates from the blog, read on! Consider watching the program-it is free to view for educational purposes, and a modest cost if you need the CLE credit. This post will be familiar to those who attended, as I covered the topic there. If you missed it and are interested viewing the recording, the webinar should be posted here within a few weeks. Last week, the SOG offered a criminal law update featuring various members of the criminal law faculty. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |